<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Browsershots: a quick review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stefanhayden.com/blog/2005/07/06/browsershots-a-quick-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stefanhayden.com/blog/2005/07/06/browsershots-a-quick-review/</link>
	<description>Graphic Artist, Technophile, Web Librarian, Embarrassingly cute spelling mistakes.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:41:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan Hayden</title>
		<link>http://www.stefanhayden.com/blog/2005/07/06/browsershots-a-quick-review/comment-page-1/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Hayden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 16:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stefanhayden.com/blog/?p=36#comment-79</guid>
		<description>Yes the first time I ran my project through there was a couple of invalid characters. I fixed them and tried to run it back through Browsershots, but I couldn&#039;t tell if it re-rendered the images or not as a new instance of images did not come up and the old set of images did not seem changed. That seem to be more of a usability problem of the site but with so much raw functionality there I&#039;m sure usability will be coming in the future. I should run it through again today to see if there is a difference. thanks for the help!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes the first time I ran my project through there was a couple of invalid characters. I fixed them and tried to run it back through Browsershots, but I couldn&#8217;t tell if it re-rendered the images or not as a new instance of images did not come up and the old set of images did not seem changed. That seem to be more of a usability problem of the site but with so much raw functionality there I&#8217;m sure usability will be coming in the future. I should run it through again today to see if there is a difference. thanks for the help!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johann C. Rocholl</title>
		<link>http://www.stefanhayden.com/blog/2005/07/06/browsershots-a-quick-review/comment-page-1/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>Johann C. Rocholl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 09:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stefanhayden.com/blog/?p=36#comment-78</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the review. You are right, private screenshots are not possible because we don&#039;t have user management with passwords yet.

The problem with IE that you mention occurs frequently when the HTML or XHTML has invalid syntax. For example, tags that are unclosed or improperly nested. Run your code through http://validator.w3.org/ to see if this could be the case.

Cheers, Johann</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the review. You are right, private screenshots are not possible because we don&#8217;t have user management with passwords yet.</p>
<p>The problem with IE that you mention occurs frequently when the HTML or XHTML has invalid syntax. For example, tags that are unclosed or improperly nested. Run your code through <a href="http://validator.w3.org/" rel="nofollow">http://validator.w3.org/</a> to see if this could be the case.</p>
<p>Cheers, Johann</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

