<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Browser Font Sizes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stefanhayden.com/blog/2006/07/20/browser-font-sizes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stefanhayden.com/blog/2006/07/20/browser-font-sizes/</link>
	<description>Graphic Artist, Technophile, Web Librarian, Embarrassingly cute spelling mistakes.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 19:55:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan Hayden</title>
		<link>http://www.stefanhayden.com/blog/2006/07/20/browser-font-sizes/comment-page-1/#comment-3436</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Hayden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 13:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stefanhayden.com/blog/2006/07/20/browser-font-sizes/#comment-3436</guid>
		<description>No feed for comments? I don&#039;t know... what ever wordpress&#039; default is. I&#039;d fix it but I&#039;m so tired of this old design that I&#039;m working on a kick as new one with clean code and new features.

I never knew it was there so it was definitely default on mine. I read some other people say the default was 9. I don&#039;t know if it&#039;s different on different version of FireFox or what. Unless there is some weird key combo that I could have accidentally pressed I would not have changed the size to 10.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No feed for comments? I don&#8217;t know&#8230; what ever wordpress&#8217; default is. I&#8217;d fix it but I&#8217;m so tired of this old design that I&#8217;m working on a kick as new one with clean code and new features.</p>
<p>I never knew it was there so it was definitely default on mine. I read some other people say the default was 9. I don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s different on different version of FireFox or what. Unless there is some weird key combo that I could have accidentally pressed I would not have changed the size to 10.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trey</title>
		<link>http://www.stefanhayden.com/blog/2006/07/20/browser-font-sizes/comment-page-1/#comment-3426</link>
		<dc:creator>Trey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 03:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stefanhayden.com/blog/2006/07/20/browser-font-sizes/#comment-3426</guid>
		<description>No feed for a particular post&#039;s comments anymore, huh? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No feed for a particular post&#8217;s comments anymore, huh? :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trey</title>
		<link>http://www.stefanhayden.com/blog/2006/07/20/browser-font-sizes/comment-page-1/#comment-3425</link>
		<dc:creator>Trey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 03:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stefanhayden.com/blog/2006/07/20/browser-font-sizes/#comment-3425</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve come across this before, but I thought it was something I had changed on my copy of FF.  Are you &lt;strong&gt;sure&lt;/strong&gt; it&#039;s default?  That really sucks.  I&#039;ve had some designs where things just don&#039;t look right if some of the text isn&#039;t smaller than 10px.  Bummer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve come across this before, but I thought it was something I had changed on my copy of FF.  Are you <strong>sure</strong> it&#8217;s default?  That really sucks.  I&#8217;ve had some designs where things just don&#8217;t look right if some of the text isn&#8217;t smaller than 10px.  Bummer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
